•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A07772 Summary:

BILL NOA07772
 
SAME ASSAME AS S07288
 
SPONSORLawler
 
COSPNSRDurso, DeStefano, Manktelow, Salka, Angelino, Brabenec
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§510.10, 530.20 & 530.40, CP L
 
Allows judges more options for when to impose bail or commit the principal to the custody of the sheriff for burglary in the second degree, robbery in the second degree and crimes which resulted in death or serious physical injury.
Go to top    

A07772 Actions:

BILL NOA07772
 
05/21/2021referred to codes
01/05/2022referred to codes
04/25/2022held for consideration in codes
Go to top

A07772 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A7772
 
SPONSOR: Lawler
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to allowing judges more options for when to impose bail or commit the principal to the custody of the sheriff   PURPOSE: To amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to allowing judges more options for when to impose bail or commit the principal to the custody of the sheriff   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill places burglary in the second degree as defined in subdivision two of section 140.25 of the penal law and robbery in the second degree as defined by subdivision one of section 160.10 of the penal law in the same category with other criminal off enses to be considered as qualifying offenses for which a defendant may be committed to the custody of the sheriff. Section 2 of the bill would amend Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) Section 530.20 and section 3 of the bill would amend CPL Section 530.40 to clas- sify any crime for which a defendant has been accused of causing the death or serious physical injury of a victim(s), as a qualifying offense for which a court may consider establishing cash bail, or committing a defendant to the custody of the sheriff in county jail. Section 4 is the effective date; November 1 immediately following the date, this bill becomes law.   JUSTIFICATION: Burglary in the second degree and Robbery in the second degree are both classified as Class C felonies, punishable by a maximum of fifteen years in a state prison. The maximum period of incarceration for which a defendant may serve if convicted should serve as an indicator for how the Legislature viewed the impact that these two serious felonies have on society. Although some may claim that these two crimes are not neces- sarily violent, both crimes as defined in Criminal Procedure Law are so potentially threatening and harmful to victim(s) that each crime argu- ably borders on violent and should thus be treated as so. This bill would treat each of these two offenses consistent with all other violent felony offenses under Penal Law Section 70.02 that are to be considered as a qualifying offense for which a judge is afforded the option to fix cash bail or to remand a defendant to the custody of a sheriff. Accord- ing to the NYS Department of Criminal Justice Services, there were 30,999 burglaries and 18,176 robberies reported to law enforcement in 2018 alone. These are not just merely statistics, but each burglary or robbery represents a person(s) whose life was impacted by inherently violent crimes. New Yorkers should not live in fear of burglars and robbers being out a of the streets because the judge's hands are tied, and therefore it is imperative that judges have the ability to remand defendants accused of Burglary in the second degree or Robbery in the second degree into the custody of the sheriff while awaiting trial should they believe it is appropriate. In addition, judges must be provided the option to fix cash bail or remand to the custody of the sheriff, those defendants accused of crimes involving death or serious physical injury to a victim(s). Under Crimi- nal Procedure Law set to take effect January 1, 2020, judges will be denied the ability to remand defendants in to custody that have alleged- ly committed crimes such as Manslaughter in the Second Degree, Criminal- ly Negligent Homicide and Aggravated Vehicular Homicide; each of these crimes are felonies and involve the death of at least one victim. As a result, judges presiding over such serious cases must have the ability to uphold public safety and to ensure that allegedly violent defendants are not out on the streets where they are free to reoffend. Enabling defendants to walk the streets freely pending trial for such serious crimes will not only lead to more New Yorkers fearing for their safety, but may also encourage non-compliance with court appearances for defend- ants that are not constrained by cash bail and that face the possibility of long prison sentences. A small number of states have chosen to or have considered doing away with pretrial cash bail in recent years. The State of California elimi- nated cash bail related to most criminal offenses in 2018. Yet Califor- nia also promoted safeguards to accompany bail reform aimed at protect- ing the public including an optional risk assessment algorithm utilized in determining bail for some criminal defendants and allocated greater funding for electronic monitoring (ankle bracelets) of some defendants pending trial. Although these safeguards remain somewhat controversial, they indicate the California Legislature took steps to protect its resi- dents. Unfortunately, similar steps to promote public safety were not taken by the New York Legislature when bail reform was passed in the FY 2019-20 state budget. Sadly, many New Yorkers believe the recent reforms to our system of cash bail were reckless, rushed, and are now dangerous to the safety and well-being of our state's residents. The New York State Legislature has the opportunity to rectify this apparent lack of foresight with the passage of this bill that will allow judges to fix cash bail or to remand a defendant into sheriff's custody in cases involving the death or serious physical injury of a victim.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A9576 (2019-2020): referred to codes   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill will take effect November 1 immediately following this bill becoming law.
Go to top