Enacts "Melanie's law"; relates to orders of protection; allows courts to issue orders of protection for immediate family members or household members of the named victims, regardless of age.
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A6026
SPONSOR: Cunningham
 
TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the family court act and the criminal procedure law, in
relation to orders of protection
 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:
To enact "Melanie's law"; to allow courts to issue orders of protection
for immediate family members or household members of the named victims,
regardless of age.
 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1 provides for the short title of this act, which shall be known
and may be cited as "Melanie's Law."
Section 2 amends the family court act to expand the definition of
"members of the same family or household" to include persons who are
related by consanguinity or affinity to parties who are or have been in
an intimate relationship.
Section 3 amends the criminal procedure law to expand the definition of
"members of the same family or household" to include persons who are
related by consanguinity or affinity to parties who are or have been in
an intimate relationship.
Section 4 provides for an immediate effective date.
 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND AMENDED VERSION (IF APPLICABLE):
N/A
 
JUSTIFICATION:
Melanie Chianese, a resident of Wappinger, NY, was a loving mother to
her son, and was working toward her degree in alcohol and substance
abuse counseling when her life was tragically taken by her mother's
ex-boyfriend while he was under supervised release pending sentence
alter pleading guilty to a domestic violence felony. The perpetrator had
a record of domestic violence allegations and an order of protection was
issued for Melanie's mother and her own son. However, as Melanie was not
an immediate family member and did not have an intimate relationship
with the perpetrator, and because she was not a minor, the order of
protection that was requested for Melanie had been denied by the court.
This oversight in the law prevents close family members of those receiv-
ing a protective order from being protected themselves. It is imperative
that such loopholes do not continue to prevent others from getting the
protection they need; and this legislation would address that by expand-
ing the definition of "members of the same family or household" in the
Family Court Act and Criminal Procedure Law, to include persons who are
related by consanguinity or affinity to parties who are or have been in
an intimate relationship. The risks posed by offenders do not strictly
follow statutory definitions, nor do they disappear when a potential
victim turns 18. By providing a more comprehensive scope of who may be
covered by an order of protection, this legislation can help prevent
Melanie's tragedy from being repeated. This act is named after Melanie
to honor her passion for helping others during her life in hopes that
her story can inspire needed change and save lives.
 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
2021-22: 59545 - Referred to Rules
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
None.
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Immediately.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
6026
2023-2024 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
March 30, 2023
___________
Introduced by M. of A. CUNNINGHAM, BEEPHAN -- read once and referred to
the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the family court act and the criminal procedure law, in
relation to orders of protection
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "Melanie's
2 law".
3 § 2. Subdivision 1 of section 812 of the family court act, as amended
4 by chapter 326 of the laws of 2008, the opening paragraph as amended by
5 chapter 109 of the laws of 2019, is amended to read as follows:
6 1. Jurisdiction. The family court and the criminal courts shall have
7 concurrent jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which would
8 constitute disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
9 an intimate image, harassment in the first degree, harassment in the
10 second degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree, sexual
11 misconduct, forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual
12 abuse in the second degree as set forth in subdivision one of section
13 130.60 of the penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the
14 second degree, stalking in the third degree, stalking in the fourth
15 degree, criminal mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in
16 the third degree, reckless endangerment, criminal obstruction of breath-
17 ing or blood circulation, strangulation in the second degree, strangula-
18 tion in the first degree, assault in the second degree, assault in the
19 third degree, an attempted assault, identity theft in the first degree,
20 identity theft in the second degree, identity theft in the third degree,
21 grand larceny in the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree,
22 coercion in the second degree or coercion in the third degree as set
23 forth in subdivisions one, two and three of section 135.60 of the penal
24 law between spouses or former spouses, or between parent and child or
25 between members of the same family or household except that if the
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04914-01-3
A. 6026 2
1 respondent would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant
2 to section 30.00 of the penal law, then the family court shall have
3 exclusive jurisdiction over such proceeding. Notwithstanding a
4 complainant's election to proceed in family court, the criminal court
5 shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceed-
6 ing pursuant to this section. In any proceeding pursuant to this arti-
7 cle, a court shall not deny an order of protection, or dismiss a peti-
8 tion, solely on the basis that the acts or events alleged are not
9 relatively contemporaneous with the date of the petition, the conclusion
10 of the fact-finding or the conclusion of the dispositional hearing. For
11 purposes of this article, "disorderly conduct" includes disorderly
12 conduct not in a public place. For purposes of this article, "members of
13 the same family or household" shall mean the following:
14 (a) persons related by consanguinity or affinity;
15 (b) persons legally married to one another;
16 (c) persons formerly married to one another regardless of whether they
17 still reside in the same household;
18 (d) persons who have a child in common regardless of whether such
19 persons have been married or have lived together at any time; [and]
20 (e) persons who are not related by consanguinity or affinity and who
21 are or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether such
22 persons have lived together at any time. Factors the court may consider
23 in determining whether a relationship is an "intimate relationship"
24 include but are not limited to: the nature or type of relationship,
25 regardless of whether the relationship is sexual in nature; the frequen-
26 cy of interaction between the persons; and the duration of the relation-
27 ship. Neither a casual acquaintance nor ordinary fraternization between
28 two individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to
29 constitute an "intimate relationship"; and
30 (f) persons who are related by consanguinity or affinity to parties
31 who are or have been in an intimate relationship as defined in paragraph
32 (e) of this subdivision.
33 § 3. Subdivision 1 of section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law, as
34 amended by chapter 326 of the laws of 2008, the opening paragraph as
35 amended by chapter 109 of the laws of 2019, is amended to read as
36 follows:
37 1. Jurisdiction. The family court and the criminal courts shall have
38 concurrent jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which would
39 constitute disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
40 an intimate image, harassment in the first degree, harassment in the
41 second degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree, sexual
42 misconduct, forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual
43 abuse in the second degree as set forth in subdivision one of section
44 130.60 of the penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the
45 second degree, stalking in the third degree, stalking in the fourth
46 degree, criminal mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in
47 the third degree, reckless endangerment, strangulation in the first
48 degree, strangulation in the second degree, criminal obstruction of
49 breathing or blood circulation, assault in the second degree, assault in
50 the third degree, an attempted assault, identity theft in the first
51 degree, identity theft in the second degree, identity theft in the third
52 degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third
53 degree, coercion in the second degree or coercion in the third degree as
54 set forth in subdivisions one, two and three of section 135.60 of the
55 penal law between spouses or former spouses, or between parent and child
56 or between members of the same family or household except that if the
A. 6026 3
1 respondent would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant
2 to section 30.00 of the penal law, then the family court shall have
3 exclusive jurisdiction over such proceeding. Notwithstanding a
4 complainant's election to proceed in family court, the criminal court
5 shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceed-
6 ing pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section, "disorderly
7 conduct" includes disorderly conduct not in a public place. For
8 purposes of this section, "members of the same family or household" with
9 respect to a proceeding in the criminal courts shall mean the following:
10 (a) persons related by consanguinity or affinity;
11 (b) persons legally married to one another;
12 (c) persons formerly married to one another regardless of whether they
13 still reside in the same household;
14 (d) persons who have a child in common, regardless of whether such
15 persons have been married or have lived together at any time; [and]
16 (e) persons who are not related by consanguinity or affinity and who
17 are or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether such
18 persons have lived together at any time. Factors the court may consider
19 in determining whether a relationship is an "intimate relationship"
20 include but are not limited to: the nature or type of relationship,
21 regardless of whether the relationship is sexual in nature; the frequen-
22 cy of interaction between the persons; and the duration of the relation-
23 ship. Neither a casual acquaintance nor ordinary fraternization between
24 two individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to
25 constitute an "intimate relationship"; and
26 (f) persons who are related by consanguinity or affinity to parties
27 who are or have been in an intimate relationship as defined in paragraph
28 (e) of this subdivision.
29 § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.