•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A09014 Summary:

BILL NOA09014
 
SAME ASSAME AS S08467
 
SPONSORLasher
 
COSPNSRCarroll R, Schiavoni, Simone, Lee, Hevesi, Kelles, Paulin, Rozic, Rosenthal, Wright, Seawright, Weprin, Hyndman, Reyes, Bores
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd Art 3 §4, add Art 3 §5-c, Constn
 
Relates to the redistricting of congressional and state legislative districts and to redistricting in the event that another state has acted to determine the district lines for congressional offices more than once in less than ten years.
Go to top

A09014 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A9014
 
SPONSOR: Lasher
  TITLE OF BILL: CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY proposing an amendment to section 4 of article 3 of the constitution, in relation to the redis- tricting of congressional and state legislative districts; and proposing an amendment to article 3 of the constitution, in relation to redis- tricting in the event that another state has acted to determine the district lines for congressional offices more than once in less than ten years   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This concurrent resolution amends the New York State Constitution to authorize the State of New York, by an act of the legislature, to deter- mine the district lines for congressional offices at any time following the action of another state to do so more than once in a ten-year peri- od.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision e of section 4 of article 3 of the State Constitution to include in its list of provisions of the Constitution that govern redistricting section 5-c of article 3, which would be added by this amendment. Section 2 amends article 3 of the State Constitution by adding a new section 5-c, which would authorize the Legislature to determine the district lines for congressional offices if another state has acted to do so more than once in less than ten years. In the event that section 5-c is triggered by another state's actions, provisions of the State Constitution pertaining to the standard decennial redistricting process would not apply, although the Legislature would be required to use the principles set forth in paragraphs one through five of subdivision (c) of section 4 of article 3, which pertain to the configuration of districts. Section 3 resolves that the amendment be referred to the first regular legislative session convening after the next succeeding general election of members of the Assembly, and, in conformity with section 1 of article 19 of the Constitution, be published for 3 months previous to the time of such election.   JUSTIFICATION:• Longstanding law and practice across the fifty states has been to redraw congressional district lines once every decade, following the federal census. The state of Texas, however, has recently indicated that it may break from precedent to effectuate a mid-decade redistricting. This may well be a harbinger of what will come from other states. The New York State Constitution generally provides only for decennial redistricting, and thus prevents New York from making more frequent adjustments to congressional district lines even if other states act to do so. While New York need not and should not fire the first shot in a battle that results in more frequent, if not continuous, redistricting actions across the country, it should not be precluded from partic- ipation in such a battle once started by other states. The amendment proposed by this resolution would be triggered in the event that another state has engaged in mid-decade redistricting, and only then would New York State, by an act of the Legislature, be allowed to determine district lines for congressional offices outside of the standard decen- nial process. In this fashion, the State would be able to appropriately defend the interests of its residents in response to the actions of other states. While this proposed amendment would not in any case have bearing on the 2026 elections, it could be effectuated in advance of the 2028 or 2030 elections and, more significantly, would address a new status quo that will play out not over one or two election cycles but over decades. New York should not be sidelined for a moment longer than necessary.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: This is a new bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: The amendment will be referred to the first regular legislative session convening after the next succeeding general election of members of the Assembly, and, in conformity with section 1 of article 19 of the consti- tution, be published for 3 months previous to the time of such election.
Go to top