“I am disappointed by the governor’s decision to move forward with signing the Medical Aid in Dying Act, even with the promise of additional amendments. Throughout the Assembly floor debate, I raised serious concerns, not about intentions, but about the structure of this legislation and the very real gaps in its protections.

“As drafted, the bill does not sufficiently guard against all forms of coercion—particularly the subtle, indirect or situational pressure that vulnerable patients may face. The safeguards outlined in the legislation rely heavily on self-reporting and physician discretion, without clear, enforceable standards to ensure a patient’s decision is truly voluntary and free from influence.

“I also expressed concern during the debate about how this policy could evolve outside the normal legislative process. Once enacted, key definitions, procedures and eligibility criteria may be altered through regulation, administrative interpretation or future legal challenges—without full legislative scrutiny. That raises legitimate questions about whether the law New Yorkers are being told is ‘narrow’ today remains narrow in practice over time.

“While the governor has indicated that amendments are intended to address some of these issues, it is impossible to assess their effectiveness without seeing the specific language. I am anxious to review the details of what is being proposed and whether those changes meaningfully strengthen protections, clarify enforcement and prevent unintended expansion.

“I will closely review any proposed amendments and continue advocating for policies that prioritize strong oversight, clear limits and accountability.”