•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A00743 Summary:

BILL NOA00743
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORAubry
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §170.56, CP L
 
Requires a criminal court to release a defendant charged with certain offenses involving marihuana on his or her own recognizance upon ordering a case adjourned in contemplation of dismissal.
Go to top    

A00743 Actions:

BILL NOA00743
 
01/11/2023referred to codes
01/03/2024referred to codes
Go to top

A00743 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A743
 
SPONSOR: Aubry
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to adjournments in contemplation of dismissal in cases involving marihuana   PURPOSE:: The purpose of this legislation is to require a criminal court to release a defendant charged with certain offenses involving marihuana on his or her own recognizance upon ordering a case adjourned in contem- plation of dismissal.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:: Section 1: Amends subdivision 2 of section 170.56 of the criminal proce- dure law, as added by chapter 1042 of the laws of 1971. Section 2: Sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Section 170.56 was added to the Criminal Procedure Law in 1971 as part of Governor Nelson Rockefeller's program to ease the impact of the strict penalties applicable to marihuana offenses. The provisions of section 170.56 are similar to those of section 170.55, which governs adjournments in contemplation of dismissal in all other cases. While section 170.55 requires a criminal court to release a defendant on his or her own recognizance once an order adjourning the matter in contem- plation of dismissal has been issued, section 170.56 makes no such provision. As a result, the court issuing an order pursuant to section 170.56 may be required to continue monitoring the case. For example, the court must retain posted bail during the period of adjournment. Once the period of adjournment expires, the court often must expend resources trying to locate the defendant or another party to return the bail. There is no programmatic or practical reason to support this distinction between sections 170.55 and 170.56. Accordingly, we propose this measure to eliminate it.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:: 2021-2022: Referred to Codes in 2021 and Referred to Codes in 2022. 2019-2020: Referred to Codes in 2019 and Referred to Codes in 2020. 2017-2018: Referred to Codes in 2017 and Referred to Codes in 2018. 2015-2016: Referred to Codes in 2015 and Referred to Codes in 2016.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:: Minimal.   EFFECTIVE DATE:: This act shall take effect on the, thirtieth day next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law and shall apply to all adjourn- ments in contemplation of dismissal ordered on and after such date.
Go to top

A00743 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                           743
 
                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 11, 2023
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. AUBRY -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Codes
 
        AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to  adjournments
          in contemplation of dismissal in cases involving marihuana
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Subdivision 2 of section 170.56 of the  criminal  procedure
     2  law, as added by chapter 1042 of the laws of 1971, is amended to read as
     3  follows:
     4    2.   Upon ordering the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal,
     5  the court must release the defendant on his or her own recognizance  and
     6  must  set  and  specify  such  conditions  for the adjournment as may be
     7  appropriate[, and such]. Such conditions may include placing the defend-
     8  ant under the supervision of any public or private agency.  At any  time
     9  prior  to  dismissal  the  court  may modify the conditions or extend or
    10  reduce the term of the adjournment, except  that  the  total  period  of
    11  adjournment  shall  not  exceed  twelve  months.   Upon violation of any
    12  condition fixed by the court, the court may revoke its order and restore
    13  the case to the calendar and the prosecution thereupon must proceed.  If
    14  the case is not so restored to the calendar during the period  fixed  by
    15  the court, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such peri-
    16  od, deemed to have been dismissed in the furtherance of justice.
    17    §  2.  This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day next succeeding
    18  the date on which it shall have become a law  and  shall  apply  to  all
    19  adjournments  in  contemplation  of  dismissal ordered on and after such
    20  date.
 
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD01621-01-3
Go to top